Seasonality Investing · Stock Seasonality, 8 Lessons · Lesson 8
People who made money with the calendar
The six masters famous for the calendar used different methods, but they shared one thing. The calendar only set the window, and they traded after confirming.
QToday's question
Did the investors famous for seasonality really trade on the calendar alone?
One person has published a market calendar since 1967, and another is said to have beaten buy-and-hold while staying in the market only a third of the time. In the final lesson, we put the six masters' methods side by side and look for the one principle they all kept.
MAPLearning map for this lesson
We build it up in three steps. At the end of each step, a 'Quick check' lets you test your understanding before moving on.
This is the last lesson. The 6-month cycle was covered in Lesson 2, the turn-of-month effect in Lesson 4, the half-year sector rotation in Lesson 5, and the three-line rule of 'condition, action, invalidation' in Lesson 7. In particular, we use the three-line rule from Lesson 7 as is in this lesson's practice.
- 1 · One number · 2 · InsightSix methods, one thing in common
You can tell the six masters' calendar signals from their confirmation filters, and explain the shared principle: 'the calendar sets the window only; trade after confirmation.'
- 3 · Data · 4 · TwistEven the masters' methods have a shelf life
You can tell whether a performance figure is a claim or a verified result, and check the numbers showing that Fosback-style calendar timing weakened after 2006.
- 5 · One actionTurn it into your own three lines
You can pick one of the six methods and rewrite it as the 'condition · action · invalidation' three-line rule from Lesson 7.
1 · One numberThey stayed in the market only a third of the time
Norman Fosback's Seasonality Timing System, built on research from the early 1970s, holds stocks only on the trading day before market holidays and around the turn of the month, and keeps money in a money market fund (MMF) on all other days. In Hulbert's 25+ year record tracking investment newsletter performance, this method averaged 11.7% a year versus 10.6% for buy and hold, and the days it held stocks were cited as about one third of the total (Crossing Wall Street, 2008-11-18).
Fosback is not the only one who made a name with the calendar. Yale Hirsch launched the Stock Trader's Almanac in 1967 and popularized terms such as 'Best Six Months,' the January barometer and the Santa rally, and his son Jeffrey Hirsch still carries on as editor. This lesson looks at the methods of six such masters side by side.
Quick checkWhen you see the number "11.7% a year," what is the first label you should attach to it?
2 · InsightSix methods, one thing in common
The six masters look at the calendar in very different units. Some look at half-years, some only at month-ends and the days before holidays, some set dates for each sector, and some slice it down to single days. But when you line the six methods up, one thing in common stands out: the calendar only decided "when to look," and actual trades were executed after confirming trend, flows and statistics.
The masters' shared structure
Sets the window only
e.g. Nov–Apr, turn of the month, sector-specific dates
Screens by trend, flows and statistics
e.g. , COT, win rate and distribution
Adjusts the weight
In weak windows: cash, bonds, defensive sectors
A diagram of what the six methodologies summarized in the course plan have in common.
The answer for weak windows was similar too. None of the six methods has a rule saying "short in the weak season"; they moved into cash or bonds, switched to defensive sectors, or stopped new buying. This means seasonality was used not as a tool for placing directional bets but as a tool for reducing risk. The sentence this course has repeated since Lesson 1, "the calendar is a filter, not a signal," is built right into the masters' methods.
Easy analogy · The fishing calendar
Anglers check a tide calendar to decide which days to go out to sea. Even so, before launching the boat they check that day's wind and waves again, and if the weather is bad they stay in, even when the calendar says it is a good day. The masters' calendars only told them which days were 'worth heading out.'
Quick checkWhat action did all six masters choose in weak windows?
3 · DataComparison table of the six methods
Click a card below to see each method's calendar signal, confirmation filter and response in weak windows. Performance figures are marked with claim. It means the figure was stated by the person or the cited outlet and has not been independently verified by this course.
Six masters of seasonality and their methods
Based on the sources cited in the course plan: Stock Trader's Almanac introduction and strategy, CXO Advisory (Sy Harding verification), Crossing Wall Street (2008-11-18), Stocks & Commodities (2002-12), CFRA-Stovall (2019), Global X Canada (2015-08-14), Wealth Professional (2023-09-20), StockCharts (2023-03), Picture Perfect Portfolios (secondary source), Seasonax (2018-02-02). The original texts were not separately verified.
Looking at the table again, the six methods divide by the unit of the calendar. Hirsch, Harding and Stovall use half-years (an extension of , Lessons 2 and 5), Fosback and Kaeppel use a few days (, Lesson 4), Thackray uses sector-specific date ranges, and Williams and Speck use weekly and daily probabilities. And except for Stovall and Fosback, all of them added one more layer of confirmation on top of the calendar, such as MACD, technical analysis, the and event filters.
Quick checkWhat is the biggest difference between Hirsch-style 6-month switching and Stovall-style half-year sector rotation?
4 · TwistEven the masters' methods have a shelf life
The basis of Fosback's method was the pattern that gains cluster around the turn of the month and the trading day before market holidays. As we saw in Lesson 4, this pattern weakened sharply after 2006. So what happens if we apply the same rule today? We calculated a simplified Fosback-style rule ourselves from S&P 500 daily closes. It holds stocks only on the last trading day of the month, the first 3 trading days of the month, and trading days followed by a weekday market closure before the next trading day, and keeps cash (0% interest) on all other days.
Fosback-style calendar timing vs buy and hold (S&P 500)
Calculated directly from Yahoo Finance ^GSPC daily closes (price index, excluding dividends and trading costs, assuming 0% interest on cash periods; the actual Fosback method earns MMF interest, so this calculation is unfavorable to calendar timing). Trading days before market closures were estimated from gaps in the daily data. 1950–1989: 10,053 trading days; 1990–2005: 4,036 trading days; 2006–2025: 5,031 trading days. Retrieved 2026-10-09.
The results flipped from period to period. In 1950–1989, holding stocks on only 21% of all trading days still produced an average of 8.51% a year, higher than buy and hold (7.94% a year). But in 1990–2005 it was 4.85% vs 8.21% a year, and in 2006–2025 it lagged badly at 2.70% vs 8.88% a year. Adding interest on cash would hardly close the gap of the last 20 years. Once the pattern became widely known and the market structure changed, the basis for the method disappeared. As we saw in Lesson 7, patterns whose cause is not rooted in rules or real demand weakened first.
Common misconceptions
"It's a famous master's method, so it still works?" No. Fosback-style calendar timing returned 2.7% a year in 2006–2025, far behind buy and hold (8.9%). The period in which a method was created can differ from today.
"A big performance number means a verified method?" No. Most are the person's own claims or secondary citations. You need to apply the same rule to a different period (an ).
"The masters traded on the calendar alone?" No. Most went through a confirmation step such as MACD, COT, technical analysis or event filters.
Quick checkA calendar strategy beat buy and hold in 1950–1989 but lagged badly after 2006. What should you do first before using it?
5 · One actionTurn a master's method into your own three lines
This is the final assignment. Pick one of the six methods and rewrite it as the three-line rule of condition · action · invalidation from Lesson 7. When you choose a master, a default sentence is filled in, and you can edit it freely. The goal of this assignment is not to follow a master's method as is, but to convert it into your own account's position size and invalidation condition.
Practice · Turn it into a three-line rule
What you enter is stored only in this device's browser. The default sentences are educational examples and do not recommend any specific trade. Once you have made a rule, check it against the five questions in Lesson 7, and first confirm that it also worked over the last 10 years.
The calculations in this course are based on price indexes, so dividends, trading costs and taxes are left out. Once costs and taxes are included, the edge of a switching strategy shrinks further. There is no guarantee that a method that worked in the past will keep working.
Quick checkWhen you turn Hirsch-style 6-month switching into three lines, what condition could go in the invalidation line?
✓What we learned today
- The six masters' methods (Hirsch·Harding, Fosback·Kaeppel, Stovall, Thackray, Williams, Speck) were different, but they shared one thing. The calendar only decided 'when to look,' and trades were executed after confirming trend, flows and statistics.
- The answer for weak windows was not short selling but cash, bonds and defensive sectors. Seasonality was used not as a tool for placing directional bets but as a tool for reducing risk.
- Most of the masters' performance figures are claims by the people themselves or by the cited outlets and have not been independently verified. Even the Fosback system's 11.7% a year is a figure cited from Hulbert's tracking.
- Applied to the S&P 500, Fosback-style calendar timing (4 days around the turn of the month + the trading day before market holidays) averaged 8.5% a year in 1950–1989, higher than buy and hold (7.9%), but in 2006–2025 it returned only 2.7% a year, far short of buy and hold (8.9%).
- Even the masters' methods have a shelf life. Whichever method you pick, rewrite it as the condition · action · invalidation three lines from Lesson 7, and first check that it also worked over the last 10 years.
The course ends with Lesson 8. To recap the five ideas: seasonality is a tilt in probability, only patterns with a cause remain, known patterns weaken, Korea's January was made by taxes, and the calendar is a filter, not a signal. Revisit any lessons you missed from the course contents, and keep the habit of reading the market every week with the weekly economy checklist in Learn (Economics).
Quiz5-question quiz
Pick an answer and it's graded right away with an explanation.
Q1. What principle showed up in common across the six masters' methods?
In all six methods, the calendar only decided 'when to look.' They went through confirmation steps such as MACD, COT, technical analysis and statistics.
Q2. How does Sam Stovall's half-year sector rotation differ from Hirsch's 6-month switching?
The Stovall method only switches sectors within stocks: cyclical sectors in Nov–Apr, and consumer staples and health care in May–Oct.
Q3. What is the right attitude toward the masters' performance figures (e.g. 11.7% a year, cumulative 213%)?
Most are not independently verified figures. Check who measured them over which period, and see whether they held in other periods.
Q4. What was the 2006–2025 result when Fosback-style calendar timing is applied simply to the S&P 500?
It beat buy and hold in 1950–1989, but lagged far behind after 2006, when its basis, the turn-of-month effect, weakened (assuming 0% interest on cash).
Q5. If you want to use one of the six methods in your own trading, what is the most suitable order?
This course's way of using it is to screen with Lesson 7's three-line rule and five questions, then express it by position size rather than the full amount.
NextTerms · Next lesson · Related tools
A historical tendency for stock returns to lean one way in the same stretch of the calendar, such as a particular month, weekday, or the turn of the year. It does not mean the pattern repeats every year; it is a statistical tendency in which the average return and the share of up periods have been tilted.
Seasonal switching strategyseasonal switchingA method of holding stocks in strong periods and bonds or cash in weak periods. It involves trading costs and taxes, and in years when stocks rise even during the weak period, you miss those gains.
MACD (moving average convergence divergence)Moving Average Convergence DivergenceAn indicator that spots trend reversals using the difference between the short-term (12-day) and long-term (26-day) exponential moving averages, along with its 9-day moving average (the signal line). A MACD crossing above the signal line is read as a buy signal, and crossing below as a sell signal.
COT reportCommitments of Traders reportA weekly report published by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) showing futures market positions by type of participant. Larry Williams used commercial traders' positions as a confirmation filter for seasonal signals.
Turn-of-month effectTurn-of-the-month effectA calendar effect in which stock gains cluster on the last trading day of each month and the first few trading days of the next. It is explained by inflows of salaries and pension contributions, and it has weakened sharply in the S&P 500 since 2006.
Sell in May (Halloween effect)Sell in May, Halloween indicatorA six-month seasonal pattern in which returns in November–April were higher than in May–October. It has been observed in many countries, but its cause has not been established.
Out-of-sample testingOut-of-sample testThis means checking whether the same pattern also shows up in a period other than the one where it was found (especially a recent period) or in another market. It is the basic way to filter out data-mining bias.
Sector rotationSector rotationThe flow in which the relatively strong sectors in the market change one after another as the phase of the economy changes. There is a textbook order, but in practice it often diverges.
Put what you learned to use right away
Seasonality Investing full contents→Weekly economy checklist→Return / CAGR calculator→For educational purposes only, not investment advice. Past statistics do not guarantee future returns. The masters' methods and performance figures are based on the sources cited in the course plan (Stock Trader's Almanac, CXO Advisory, Crossing Wall Street 2008-11-18, Stocks & Commodities 2002-12, CFRA-Stovall 2019, Global X Canada 2015-08-14, Wealth Professional 2023-09-20, StockCharts 2023-03, Picture Perfect Portfolios, Seasonax 2018-02-02), and the original texts were not separately verified. The S&P 500 calendar-timing calculations were made directly from Yahoo Finance ^GSPC daily closes (price index, excluding dividends, trading costs and interest on cash; retrieved 2026-10-09).